Auto Finance News
  • Home
  • News
  • AI Tool
  • Big Wheels Data
  • Events
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Auto Finance Summit East
    • Auto Finance Capital Summit (NEW)
    • PowerSports Finance Summit
    • Current Webinars
    • Webinar Library
    • Equipment Finance Connect
  • Podcast
  • Features
  • Powersports
  • Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
Auto Finance News
  • Home
  • News
  • AI Tool
  • Big Wheels Data
  • Events
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Auto Finance Summit East
    • Auto Finance Capital Summit (NEW)
    • PowerSports Finance Summit
    • Current Webinars
    • Webinar Library
    • Equipment Finance Connect
  • Podcast
  • Features
  • Powersports
  • Subscribe
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
Auto Finance News
No Result
View All Result

Home » 5 lessons to learn from software vendor data breach

5 lessons to learn from software vendor data breach

Drew PattybyDrew Patty
August 9, 2019
in Compliance
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
5 lessons to learn from software vendor data breach

© Can Stock Photo / sergey150770

According to a June 12 settlement announced by the Federal Trade Commission, back in 2015 an employee of Iowa-based LightYear Dealer Technologies, the parent company of DealerBuilt, plugged a storage device into the company’s backup network to increase storage capacity. However, the employee failed to ensure that the device was securely configured, thereby providing an open, insecure port into the company network, which was open for 18 months.

Subsequently, a hacker penetrated the network and gained access to the company’s unencrypted backup data, including personal information — such as Social Security and drivers’ license numbers — of about 12.5 million consumers, and the entire backup directories of five dealerships. DealerBuilt failed to detect the breach until an auto dealer’s customer complained about personal information becoming public on the internet, and a reporter told the company about the security vulnerability.

The alleged insecure access enabled by the employee’s device installation, along with other poor data control and security practices allegedly ongoing at DealerBuilt, led the FTC to allege unfair practices and violation of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s Safeguards Rule (GLB) against DealerBuilt.

The FTC asserted that DealerBuilt met the definition of a “financial institution” for purposes of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. (Under GLB, any institution engaged in certain “finance activities” may be considered a “financial institution.” Sufficient “finance activities” include those that are “financial in nature” or “incidental to financial activity,” as these terms are defined in 12 U.S.C. 1843(k) and by regulations promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.) GLB further requires financial institutions to develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive information security program; identify reasonably foreseeable risks to the security, confidentiality and integrity of customer information; and implement basic safeguards and regularly test their effectiveness, all of which DealerBuilt failed to undertake, according to the FTC.

DealerBuilt’s data security practices, which were alleged to be lax at the time the FTC filed its complaint, included:

  • Storing information in clear text, without any access controls or authentication protections like passwords or tokens. Data transmitted between dealerships and DealerBuilt’s backup database also was in clear text.
  • No written information security policy.
  • No provision of reasonable data security training for employees or contractors.
  • No assessment of risks to the sensitive data on its network by conducting periodic risk assessments or performing vulnerability and penetration testing.
  • No use of readily available security measures to monitor – among other things – unauthorized attempts to transfer sensitive information.
  • No reasonable data access controls in place – for example, systems to limit inbound connections to known IP addresses or require authentication to access backup databases.
  • No reasonable process to select, install and secure devices with access to personal information.

In reporting the outcome of the case’s proposed settlement, the FTC noted the following key recommendations for those in possession of consumer personal information:

1) Train and supervise your employees to be security-centric.

2) Exercise care when installing devices with network access.

3) Note that Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act coverage is broad. Consider whether your business (or affiliates or service providers) could be a “financial institution” subject to the GLB Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314). All it takes is for a business to be “significantly engaged” in providing financial products or services.

4) If your company uses third-party software or providers, build security into your contracts with those providers.

5) Remember that service providers also are accountable for protecting the personal data they collect and store.

Drew Patty is a Member (Partner) in McGlinchey Stafford’s Baton Rouge office. He co-chairs the firm’s Cybersecurity and Data Privacy practice group and leads the firm’s Intellectual Property section. He regularly counsels clients regarding internet privacy and data privacy policies and procedures, as well as regulatory advice concerning compliance with data transfer regulations. He also guides clients in vendor management efforts in negotiating and drafting cloud services, software license, and other vendor contracts with appropriate data security, cyber insurance, and data management provisions. Drew can be reached at dpatty@mcglinchey.com or at (225) 382-3720.

Tags: complianceFederal ReserveFederal Trade Commission
Previous Post

Westlake likely to take over SNAAC servicing

Next Post

Aussie fintech to enter US auto market

Related Posts

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, Dec. 23, 2020. The Trump administration has done its best to cut the CFPB giving large banks a reprieve from aggressive enforcement and new rules. With Joe Biden ascending to the White House, Wall Street is worried it will be quickly resurrected.
Compliance

CFPB streamlines supervision focus for 2026 examinations

November 24, 2025
CFPB sues TransUnion
Compliance

Trump nominates a new CFPB head, but Vought isn’t going anywhere

November 20, 2025
CFPB to cut financial firm supervision, curb fintech focus
Compliance

CFPB funding in jeopardy following DOJ decision 

November 12, 2025
A seal at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Compliance

CFPB change to nonbank oversight could affect securitizations  

October 29, 2025
Next Post
Aussie fintech to enter US auto market

Aussie fintech to enter US auto market

Please login to join discussion

Stay Informed with Our Newsletters

PowerSports Finance - Monthly coverage of the powersports lending market

The Roadmap Podcast

ABOUT US

HELP CENTER

ADVERTISE

PRIVACY TERMS

ADA COMPLIANCE

CODE OF JOURNALISM ETHICS

[wt_cli_manage_consent]

EXECUTIVES OF THE YEAR

AUTO FINANCE EXCELLENCE AWARDS

MAGAZINE ARCHIVE

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

facebook linkedin twitter podcast podcast

© 2025 Royal Media Group

Ok

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Capital & Funding
    • EVs
    • Technology
    • Management
    • Powersports Finance News
    • Risk Management
    • Sales & Marketing
  • Events
    • Auto Finance Summit East
    • Equipment Finance Connect
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • PowerSports Finance Summit
  • Features
    • Latest Issue
    • Features
    • New Tracks
    • Car Culture
    • Staffing Shuffles
    • Under The Hood
    • Spotlight
    • Issue Archive
  • Podcast
  • Big Wheels Data
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Log In / Account

© 2025 Royal Media Group