The Next TCPA Battle | Auto Finance News The Next TCPA Battle | Auto Finance News
Auto Finance News

No products in the cart.

Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Capital & Funding
    • Compliance & Regs
    • EVs
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Powersports
    • Risk Management
    • Sales & Marketing
  • Events
    • Auto Finance Summit East
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Powersports Finance Summit
    • Equipment Finance Connect
  • EXCELLENCE
    • Best Practices
    • Columns
      • Strategy Upshift: Georg Bauer
      • Under The Hood: Marcie Belles
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Data
  • Magazine
    • Latest Issue
    • Features
    • New Tracks
    • Car Culture
    • Staffing Shuffles
    • Under The Hood
    • Spotlight
    • Issue Archive
  • Podcast
AFN PLUS
Log In
No Result
View All Result
Auto Finance News
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Capital & Funding
    • Compliance & Regs
    • EVs
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Powersports
    • Risk Management
    • Sales & Marketing
  • Events
    • Auto Finance Summit East
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Powersports Finance Summit
    • Equipment Finance Connect
  • EXCELLENCE
    • Best Practices
    • Columns
      • Strategy Upshift: Georg Bauer
      • Under The Hood: Marcie Belles
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Data
  • Magazine
    • Latest Issue
    • Features
    • New Tracks
    • Car Culture
    • Staffing Shuffles
    • Under The Hood
    • Spotlight
    • Issue Archive
  • Podcast
AFN PLUS
Log In
No Result
View All Result
Auto Finance News
No Result
View All Result

The Next TCPA Battle

Michael Benoit & Michael Goodman by Michael Benoit & Michael Goodman
May 25, 2018
in Compliance
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
© Can Stock Photo / stokkete

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) was a well-intentioned and early attempt to limit the number of telemarketing calls consumers receive. Among other things, it restricts telephone solicitations (i.e., telemarketing) and the use of so-called “autodialers.” Over the years, it’s been a challenge to determine what equipment is an autodialer and what isn’t.

The statute defines an autodialer as equipment that has the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and to dial such numbers. The Federal Communications Commission rule implementing the TCPA says the same thing (and always has).

While the FCC has broadened the definition to the point of incredulity over the years, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion on March 16 — ACA International v. FCC. The issued opinion reels in the FCC’s creative interpretation, but fails to answer the critical question necessary to determine whether a device is an autodialer for TCPA purposes, i.e., whether a device is an autodialer regulated under the TCPA (thus subjecting users to potential liability) based on how one actually used it to make a call or send a text, or by what it was capable of doing at the time it was used.

A little background may be helpful. In 2003, the FCC exercised its authority to consider changes in technology by turning its attention to so-called “predictive dialers.” The FCC reasoned that the early days of random or sequential dialing had been replaced by equipment that could upload large lists of phone numbers to be dialed automatically. The FCC asserted that failure to regulate a predictive dialer as an autodialer would lead to an unintended result. Ironically, this view led the FCC ultimately to view smartphones as “autodialers” — an unintended consequence of the highest order.

It gets better. In 2008, the FCC ratified an earlier statement that, under its TCPA autodialer standard, what matters is whether the equipment or device is capable of dialing without human intervention. This interpretation took on even greater significance in 2012, when the FCC created a new, stricter consent standard for advertising messages that were sent using an autodialer.

The FCC’s expanding interpretation of what constituted an autodialer meant that a wider range of advertising calls and texts would be subject to astandard requiring a signed, written consent from the consumer. Companies could no longer rely on an established business relationship to market to their customers using the increased efficiencies of autodialing equipment.

In 2015, the FCC fumbled away a great opportunity to provide clear standards on the definition of an autodialer. Among other things, the FCC made the stunning announcement that a rotary phone is not an autodialer. Second, the FCC passed on the chance to declare that smartphones were not autodialers (it observed that consumers didn’t seem to be suing each other over routine smartphone uses). Third, the FCC introduced the concept of “potential functionalities” (i.e., what it could do in the future if it were reconfigured or reprogrammed) when considering a device’s “capacity.”

It is no wonder this analytical trainwreck got the FCC sued, culminating in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals March 16 decision in the ACA International case. The court was unimpressed by the FCC’s 2015 autodialer reasoning. It rejected any interpretation that could subject smartphones to regulation as TCPA autodialers, seeing this as an unintended consequence on a massive scale that the FCC could have avoided.

The court also thumbed its nose at the FCC’s “potential functionalities” construction. Brisk rejection of the FCC’s 2015 analysis seemed to be building to a sweet and satisfying conclusion, until it became clear that the court was not going to opine whether the use or capability of a device determines whether it is an autodialer for TCPA purposes.

Textually, one can argue that the statutory language focused on a device’s “capacity” leads to the conclusion that it is what the device is capable of, as opposed to how it was used. In the real world, this distinction unfolds all the time in companies that have a unified telecommunications system. For example, a company may have an autodialer its agents might be connected to for all communications — from payment reminders (which are subject to a lower TCPA consent standard) to product marketing calls (which, if made with an autodialer, require prior written consent from the party being called.)

The device allows agents to use the dialer’s predictive capacity when permitted — e.g., for payment reminders — but not for marketing contacts. Under a textual argument, an agent’s manually dialed marketing calls and texts made with the unified telecommunications system trigger the strict “prior written consent” standard because the system has the “capacity” to operate as an autodialer.

On the other hand, one can argue that a consumer contacted by a device that has predictive dialing capabilities but which were not used in making the call suffered no compensable injury and thus lacks standing to sue.

Congress could not possibly have intended the TCPA to effectively encompass the majority of communication devices in use today. Further, it could not have conceived in 1991 that smartphones would even exist, much less conceive of them to be as ubiquitous as they are. In order to achieve the intent of the TCPA, one must read into the textual argument that “capacity” implies “use.”

The D.C. Circuit may have handed the battle to the industry, but the war is not yet won. The tension between “capacity” and “use” will be the next big battle on the TCPA front, absent Congress stepping in to update the law.

Sure, that will happen.

Michael Benoit and Michael Goodman are partners in the Washington, D.C., office of Hudson Cook LLP. Benoit is a frequent speaker and writer on a variety of consumer credit topics and can be reached at 202-327-9705 or [email protected] Goodman is a practitioner in the TCPA and marketing space and can be reached at 202-327-9704 or [email protected] Nothing in this article is legal advice and should not be taken as such. Please address all legal questions to your counsel.

Tags: Federal Communications CommissionSponsored
Previous Post

Business Intelligence, Business Woes: Why Machine Learning is Causing Regulatory Concern

Next Post

HyreCar Files for IPO, Seeks to Sell 2M Shares

Related Posts

© Can Stock Photo / zolnierek
Compliance

Data Sharing: Which privacy laws apply?

March 9, 2023
© Can Stock Photo / slickspics
Compliance

How an affirmative action decision could impact workplace diversity

February 23, 2023
© Can Stock Photo / Apriori
Compliance

Regulatory and legislative trends for 2023

December 22, 2022
Next Post

HyreCar Files for IPO, Seeks to Sell 2M Shares

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

STAY INFORMED WITH OUR NEWS ALERTS

COLUMNS

© Can Stock Photo / sparky2000

Under the Hood: Subscription programs may worsen consumers’ auto finance health

March 17, 2023
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) headquarters in Washington, D.C., US, on Sunday, May 22, 2022. The Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 50 basis points earlier this month and the chairman indicated it was on track to make similar-sized moves at its meetings in June and July. Photographer: Joshua Roberts/Bloomberg

New data request could feed CFPB enforcement actions

February 27, 2023

INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY

© Can Stock Photo / tentacula

Vehicle inspection startup Ravin partners with online marketplace

March 17, 2023
A Businessman Has A Virtual Graphic Of Chatgpt In His Hand. Chatbot, Chat With Ai, Artificial

Letter from the editor

March 17, 2023

RISK MANAGEMENT

© Can Stock Photo / sparky2000

Under the Hood: Subscription programs may worsen consumers’ auto finance health

March 17, 2023
A row of 2016 Toyota Motor Corp. Camry vehicles sit on display for sale on the lot of the Peoria Toyota Scion car dealership in Peoria, Illinois, U.S.

Open Lending protection program piques increased bank interest

March 16, 2023

SPONSORED

© Can Stock Photo / Ajlber

Q&A with CCC Intelligent Solutions VP of Lender Services Rick Evans

December 7, 2022

Your SaaS, Covered: Risk Decisioning through Economic Uncertainty

June 8, 2022
Drive a better consumer experience in auto financing with instant decisioning

Drive a better consumer experience in auto financing with instant decisioning

May 9, 2022

About

ABOUT US

PRIVACY TERMS

ADA COMPLIANCE

CODE OF JOURNALISM ETHICS

Manage Cookie Consent

Contact Us

ADVERTISE

HELP CENTER

Follow Us

twitter linkedin podcast
© 2023 Royal Media
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Capital & Funding
    • Compliance & Regs
    • EVs
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Management
    • Powersports
    • Risk Management
    • Sales & Marketing
  • Events
    • Auto Finance Summit East
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Powersports Finance Summit
    • Equipment Finance Connect
  • Excellence
    • Best Practices
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Magazine
    • Latest Issue
    • Features
    • New Tracks
    • Car Culture
    • Staffing Shuffles
    • Under The Hood
    • Spotlight
    • Issue Archive
  • Podcast
  • Data
  • +PLUS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Log In / Account

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Powered By MemberPress WooCommerce Plus Integration
THIS WEBSITE USES COOKIES

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “I CONSENT”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.

Cookie settingsI CONSENT

Review our Cookie Policies
.
Manage Cookie Consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
34f6831605sessionGeneral purpose platform session cookie, used by sites written in JSP. Usually used to maintain an anonymous user session by the server.
a64cedc0bfsessionGeneral purpose platform session cookie, used by sites written in JSP. Usually used to maintain an anonymous user session by the server.
CookieConsentPolicy1 yearUsed to apply end-user cookie consent preferences set by our client-side utility.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
crmcsrsessionGeneral purpose platform session cookie, used by sites written in JSP. Usually used to maintain an anonymous user session by the server.
JSESSIONIDsessionThe JSESSIONID cookie is used by New Relic to store a session identifier so that New Relic can monitor session counts for an application.
LS_CSRF_TOKENsessionCloudflare sets this cookie to track users’ activities across multiple websites. It expires once the browser is closed.
LSKey-c$CookieConsentPolicy1 yearUsed to apply end-user cookie consent preferences set by our client-side utility.
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
CookieDurationDescription
__cf_bm30 minutesThis cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management.
_zcsr_tmpsessionZoho sets this cookie for the login function on the website.
663a60c55dsessionThis cookie is related to Zoho (Customer Service) Chatbox
e188bc05fesessionThis cookie is set in relation to Zoho Campaigns
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThe _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
_gid1 dayInstalled by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
CONSENT2 yearsYouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
vuid2 yearsVimeo installs this cookie to collect tracking information by setting a unique ID to embed videos to the website.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
__Host-GAPS2 yearsThis cookie allows the website to identify a user and provide enhanced functionality and personalisation.
_dc_gtm_UA-1038974-31 minuteUsed to help identify the visitors by either age, gender, or interests by DoubleClick - Google Tag Manager.
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to display advertisements when either on Facebook or on a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising, after visiting the website.
fr3 monthsFacebook sets this cookie to show relevant advertisements to users by tracking user behaviour across the web, on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
test_cookie15 minutesThe test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE5 months 27 daysA cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSCsessionYSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devicesneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt-remote-device-idneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
yt.innertube::nextIdneverThis cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
yt.innertube::requestsneverThis cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
caf_ipaddrsessionNo description available.
citysessionNo description available.
countrysessionNo description available.
gnt_eidsessionNo description available.
gnt_eu6 hoursNo description
iamcsrsessionZoho (Customer Support) sets this cookie and is used for tracking visitors (for performance purposes)
systemsessionNo description available.
traffic_targetsessionNo description available.
Save & Accept
Powered by CookieYes Logo