CFPB refines debt-collection rule | Auto Finance News CFPB refines debt-collection rule | Auto Finance News
Auto Finance News
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Management
    • Compliance & Regs
    • Risk Management
    • Capital & Funding
    • Powersports
  • Events
    • DEMOvation Challenge
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Auto Finance Innovation Summit
  • EXCELLENCE
    • Best Practices
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Magazine
    • Latest
    • Magazine Issues
  • Data
    • Lender Ranking
    • Fixed Rate Outstandings at Banks
    • Securitizations
    • Market Share Monitor
AFN PLUS
Monday, January 25, 2021
Log In
No Result
View All Result
Auto Finance News
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Management
    • Compliance & Regs
    • Risk Management
    • Capital & Funding
    • Powersports
  • Events
    • DEMOvation Challenge
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Auto Finance Innovation Summit
  • EXCELLENCE
    • Best Practices
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Magazine
    • Latest
    • Magazine Issues
  • Data
    • Lender Ranking
    • Fixed Rate Outstandings at Banks
    • Securitizations
    • Market Share Monitor
AFN PLUS
Log In
No Result
View All Result
Auto Finance News
No Result
View All Result

CFPB refines debt-collection rule

Marcie Belles by Marcie Belles
November 30, 2020
in Compliance & Regulation
Reading Time: 3min read

After reviewing 37,000 comments in the past seven years, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is nearing the finish line on refinements to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

On Oct. 30, the CFPB issued a 653-page final rule that amended Regulation F, which implements the FDCPA to give consumers control over debt-collection communications, including text and email messages. Several elements of the rule are slated to be hammered out in December — specifically, validation notices, disclosures for time-barred debts, and credit reporting by debt collectors. The rule will go into effect one year after its publication in the Federal Register.

On the surface, the rule applies only to third-party debt collectors, like independent collection agencies. But many of the rule’s standards will likely establish compliance benchmarks for first-party creditors —lenders. Deviation from those benchmarks could constitute violations of the Dodd-Frank Act’s mandate that lenders refrain from engaging in unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices (UDAAP). Further, lenders are required under Dodd-Frank to supervise their service providers to ensure compliance with federal consumer financial laws like the FDCPA.

The CFPB’s debt-collection rule spells out the frequency with which collectors can call consumers about delinquent accounts, and clarifies email and text message communication procedures. The rule aims to prevent harassment or abuse, false or misleading representations, and unfair practices in debt collection.

Regarding call frequency, collectors must limit collection attempts via telephone to seven times in seven consecutive days. So, collection firms must keep a tally of calls for every rolling seven-day period. Also, agencies may not call within seven days of having had a conversation with the consumer in connection with collection of the debt. If, for example, a customer sends the collection agency a text message, and the agency resolves the issue or the text turns into a chat on the company’s website, the agency must have a mechanism in place to prevent calls to that person for the next seven days.

While the frequency standard applies to telephone calls, it does not apply to digital messages.

For text and email, each message must include an opt-out that is easy for consumers to see and exercise. Verbal opt-outs count, too. If a consumer tells a debt collector to stop emailing, for instance, the agent must abide by that request — and recognize that the customer’s preference can change frequently. As such, collection firms must have technology in place to continuously update communication preferences.

As such, agents should be trained to clarify consumer opt-outs. If the customer says, “Don’t email me,” the agent should attempt to determine whether that request is being made for that day, the week, or indefinitely. Similarly, if the customer says, “Don’t call me on Tuesdays at 3 p.m.,” but then the customer calls next Tuesday at 3 p.m., the collector can’t take that to mean that the timing is OK for future calls. Rather, the agent will need to reconfirm with the customer, perhaps asking when would be a good time to be contacted.

Meanwhile, opt-out requests can lead to lags in collection attempts. In the case of a debt that is being transferred to a collection agency, the creditor must send an opt-out notice that informs the consumer that the collector might communicate using the consumer’s email address. The collector must hold off on email collection efforts for 35 days to give the consumer a chance to respond.

For texts, the phone number has to come directly from the consumer, not from the creditor or a previous collection agency. The consumer either has to use the number to contact the agency about the debt and not opt out within 60 days, or the consumer has to have consented for the agency to use the number. As such, collection agents should constantly seek to refresh consent, otherwise, collectors will have to grapple with determining how close they are to the end of the 60-day window for consent.

With all these protections in place, consumers still have the upper hand when it comes to claims of harassment. Even if a collector makes only six call attempts in a seven-day period, a consumer may challenge whether that frequency is reasonable. Consumers may also allege harassment for what they deem to be an excessive number of emails or text messages.

As the ink dries on this new FDCPA rule, lenders would be wise to start defining best practices for debt collection. They should consider enhancing their compliance-management systems by developing written policies and procedures — particularly around email and text communication — that incorporate the new requirements into existing monitoring programs. They should update collector-training procedures to ensure that agents are securing appropriate consents and staying abreast of communication preferences. Lenders should also revisit their vendor-management protocols and due-diligence procedures to ensure that service providers are prepared when the implementation period begins.

Tags: Bureau of Consumer Financial ProtectionFDCPAPremiumUnder the Hood
Previous Post

Inside digital-retailing pain points with Market Scan’s Rusty West

Next Post

PNC eyes footprint expansion with BBVA acquisition

Related Posts

Biden taps Gensler as SEC chairman, FTC’s Chopra as CFPB chief
Compliance & Regulation

Biden taps Gensler as SEC chairman, FTC’s Chopra as CFPB chief

January 18, 2021
Illinois to implement 36% rate cap on auto loans
Compliance & Regulation

Illinois to implement 36% rate cap on auto loans

January 13, 2021
Murky waters: Navigating GAP state regulations
Compliance & Regulation

Murky waters: Navigating GAP state regulations

January 12, 2021
Next Post
PNC eyes footprint expansion with BBVA acquisition

PNC eyes footprint expansion with BBVA acquisition

Latest Magazine Issue

INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY

Upstart partners with Oriental Bank, enlarges lending footprint

Upstart partners with Oriental Bank, enlarges lending footprint

January 20, 2021
GM jumps as Microsoft joins $2B self-driving venture

GM jumps as Microsoft joins $2B self-driving venture

January 19, 2021

Sign Up Email List

CORONAVIRUS

Used-vehicle prices increase, inventory outpaces norm

Used-vehicle prices increase, inventory outpaces norm

January 22, 2021
Dueling dynamics will shape consumer credit in 2021

Dueling dynamics will shape consumer credit in 2021

January 20, 2021

SPONSORED

Collateral Protection Insurance (CPI): What is CPI and what does it do?

Collateral Protection Insurance (CPI): What is CPI and what does it do?

January 8, 2021
US auto sales poised for crash after slowest pace in a decade

Driving Customer Loyalty, Retention After Total Loss

December 9, 2020
When tough times hit, proactive strategies pay

When tough times hit, proactive strategies pay

November 2, 2020

About

ABOUT US

PRIVACY TERMS

ADA COMPLIANCE

CODE OF JOURNALISM ETHICS

Contact Us

ADVERTISE

HELP CENTER

EMAIL SIGN UP 

Follow Us

twitter twitter linkedin podcast

©2021 Royal Media & Auto Finance News

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Management
    • Compliance & Regs
    • Risk Management
    • Capital & Funding
    • Powersports
  • Events
    • DEMOvation Challenge
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Auto Finance Innovation Summit
  • Excellence
    • Best Practices
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Magazine
    • Latest
    • Magazine Issues
  • Data
    • Lender Ranking
    • Fixed Rate Outstandings
    • Securitizations
    • Market Share Monitor
  • +PLUS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Log In / Account

© 2020 Royal Media

Go to mobile version