What a new Nevada spousal credit law means for lenders | Auto Finance News What a new Nevada spousal credit law means for lenders | Auto Finance News
Auto Finance News
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Management
    • Compliance & Regs
    • Risk Management
    • Capital & Funding
    • Powersports
  • Events
    • DEMOvation Challenge
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Auto Finance Innovation Summit
  • EXCELLENCE
    • Best Practices
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Magazine
    • Latest
    • Magazine Issues
  • Data
    • Lender Ranking
    • Fixed Rate Outstandings at Banks
    • Securitizations
    • Market Share Monitor
AFN PLUS
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Log In
No Result
View All Result
Auto Finance News
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Management
    • Compliance & Regs
    • Risk Management
    • Capital & Funding
    • Powersports
  • Events
    • DEMOvation Challenge
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Auto Finance Innovation Summit
  • EXCELLENCE
    • Best Practices
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Magazine
    • Latest
    • Magazine Issues
  • Data
    • Lender Ranking
    • Fixed Rate Outstandings at Banks
    • Securitizations
    • Market Share Monitor
AFN PLUS
Log In
No Result
View All Result
Auto Finance News
No Result
View All Result

What a new Nevada spousal credit law means for lenders

Candy Burnette by Candy Burnette
August 28, 2019
in Compliance
Reading Time: 2min read

Nevada recently amended its Equal Opportunity for Credit statute to give special rights to credit applicants who do not have individual credit histories because their accounts were established in their spouses’ names. (See Nevada SB311, effective October 1, 2019). The Nevada law applies to a creditor offering any credit product in Nevada, including a finance company that participates in the decision to extend credit as an assignee of an original creditor, which may include auto finance companies.

A credit applicant who was or is married, and has no credit history, may now request that a creditor consider the applicant’s credit history to be identical to that of the applicant’s spouse which was established during the marriage. The creditor may request proof of the marriage and the dates of the marriage. A creditor that does not comply with an applicant’s valid request will be considered have discriminated against the applicant based on his or her marital status.

The new Nevada law goes farther than federal law in giving special rights to a married applicant with no individual credit history. Federal law requires a creditor to consider, if requested by the applicant, the history of an account reported in the name of the applicant’s spouse or former spouse when available, and when the applicant can demonstrate that the account accurately reflects his or her own creditworthiness. The applicant could demonstrate this through, for example, records showing payment from a joint account, or records showing that the applicant’s income provided the funds to make the payments on the account.

Unlike federal law, Nevada law does not require the applicant to demonstrate that the spousal account reflects his or her own creditworthiness. Instead, Nevada law presumes equal creditworthiness based on the fact of the marriage. Because of this difference, compliance with federal law will be insufficient in Nevada.  Fortunately, it does not appear that compliance with the Nevada requirement will violate federal law in terms of the credit application. Because the Nevada statute requires the applicant to request that the creditor consider the spouse’s credit history, a creditor is not required to ask about marital status in the credit application. However, the Nevada requirement may pose problems for creditors in complying with other federal law. A creditor cannot pull a credit report without a permissible purpose under federal law, and a state requirement does not provide a permissible purpose. Although federal law allows a creditor to pull a report on a current spouse in community property states like Nevada, there is no permissible purpose to pull a report on a former spouse without consent.

Importantly, the Nevada law is limited to the situation where an applicant has “no credit history.” The statute does not explain what “no credit history” means. So it is reasonable to assume the requirement would only apply where the applicant has no credit history at all, positive or negative. The law would not appear to allow an applicant to replace or supplement his or her own negative credit history with the positive credit history of the spouse when applying for individual credit.

Candy Burnette is Of Counsel in McGlinchey Stafford’s Cleveland office. Candy advises consumer financial services clients on state and federal compliance issues and licensing, focusing on auto finance, servicing, and debt collection.  She can be reached at [email protected] or (216) 378-4976.

Tags: complianceMcGlinchey Stafford
Previous Post

Pentagon FCU gears up for omnichannel approvals

Next Post

Tricolor CEO joins AFS speaker roster

Related Posts

2021 predictions compliance
Compliance

Auto finance compliance predictions for 2021

January 5, 2021
Post covid economic trends in auto finance
Compliance

Post-COVID economic trends in auto finance

December 14, 2020
Legislation in auto finance: What’s on the horizon?1
Compliance

Legislation in auto finance: What’s on the horizon?

December 8, 2020
Next Post
Changes in Transportation Models a Greater Threat Than Economic Downturn, CPS CFO Says

Tricolor CEO joins AFS speaker roster

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest Magazine Issue

INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY

Upstart partners with Oriental Bank, enlarges lending footprint

Upstart partners with Oriental Bank, enlarges lending footprint

January 20, 2021
GM jumps as Microsoft joins $2B self-driving venture

GM jumps as Microsoft joins $2B self-driving venture

January 19, 2021

Sign Up Email List

CORONAVIRUS

Huntington Auto sees Q4 decline in dealer floorplan

Huntington Auto sees Q4 decline in dealer floorplan

January 26, 2021
Used-vehicle prices increase, inventory outpaces norm

Used-vehicle prices increase, inventory outpaces norm

January 22, 2021

SPONSORED

Collateral Protection Insurance (CPI): What is CPI and what does it do?

Collateral Protection Insurance (CPI): What is CPI and what does it do?

January 8, 2021
US auto sales poised for crash after slowest pace in a decade

Driving Customer Loyalty, Retention After Total Loss

December 9, 2020
When tough times hit, proactive strategies pay

When tough times hit, proactive strategies pay

November 2, 2020

About

ABOUT US

PRIVACY TERMS

ADA COMPLIANCE

CODE OF JOURNALISM ETHICS

Contact Us

ADVERTISE

HELP CENTER

EMAIL SIGN UP 

Follow Us

twitter twitter linkedin podcast

©2021 Royal Media & Auto Finance News

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • All News
    • Exec of the Year
    • Innovation & Technology
    • Management
    • Compliance & Regs
    • Risk Management
    • Capital & Funding
    • Powersports
  • Events
    • DEMOvation Challenge
    • Auto Finance Summit
    • Auto Finance Innovation Summit
  • Excellence
    • Best Practices
    • Topics
      • Compliance
      • Customer Experience
      • Technology
    • White Papers
    • Glossary
  • Magazine
    • Latest
    • Magazine Issues
  • Data
    • Lender Ranking
    • Fixed Rate Outstandings
    • Securitizations
    • Market Share Monitor
  • +PLUS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Log In / Account

© 2020 Royal Media

Go to mobile version